Describe your use
Record your role, EU market scope, human interaction and generated content types.
Implement, document and maintain EU AI Act Article 50 transparency controls — with every action tied to an official source.
Technical readiness information. No legal conclusions. No card required.
AI interaction disclosure
Article 50(1)Machine-readable marking
Article 50(2)Editorial responsibility
Article 50(4)AI SaaS teams
Content operations
Agencies
Professional review
No black-box compliance score. You provide the facts; the workspace turns them into traceable implementation tasks.
Record your role, EU market scope, human interaction and generated content types.
See possible transparency actions, evidence gaps and questions for professional review.
Build a versioned record of notices, labels, owners, reviews and official rule sources.
Move beyond static checklists. Each technical control connects the responsible person, implementation proof and current source.
Accessible, versioned disclosure copy for chatbots, agents and avatars.
Track machine-readable marking and visible labels across content types.
Record substantive checks, changes, sources and final responsibility.
Package systems, controls, proofs and rule snapshots for internal or professional review.
Plans are based on systems and collaboration, not legal conclusions. Cancel or export your data at any time.
Readiness checker, one draft AI system, one disclosure and one visible label.
3 AI systems, controls, disclosures, assets and evidence packs.
PAID PLAN COMING SOON10 systems, review workflows, complete exports and larger teams.
PAID PLAN COMING SOONArticle 50 applies from 2 August 2026. Specific transition details can depend on the system and obligation, so every report records its rule version and official source.
No. It implements technical controls and organises evidence for internal or qualified professional review. It does not provide a legal opinion or official certificate.
Keep the exact disclosure wording, locale, component version, deployment URL, verification date, owner and screenshots or code proving that it was shown.
No. The review workflow explicitly prevents grammar, spelling or formatting-only checks from being recorded as substantive review.
Complete a focused technical readiness check in under ten minutes.